Fram2 Mission Breakdown – Real or CGI?

The Fram2 mission has sparked intense debates online, with some celebrating it as a breakthrough in private spaceflight while others dismiss it as CGI trickery. Launched by SpaceX on March 31, 2025, Fram2 became the first human spaceflight to enter a polar orbit, passing over both the North and South Poles.

Unlike previous missions that remained in lower latitudes, this trajectory provided a unique perspective of Earth, making the footage appear different from what most people are used to seeing. The crew consisted of private individuals, not career astronauts, including a cinematographer, a crypto entrepreneur, a robotics expert, and a polar explorer. They were not just tourists; they conducted real scientific experiments, including studying radiation exposure, atmospheric data collection, and how certain materials behave in microgravity. Despite this, conspiracy theorists quickly labeled the mission as fake, claiming the footage looked “too perfect” and accusing SpaceX of using a fisheye lens to exaggerate the Earth’s curvature.

One of the most common claims is that the video was filmed in a studio, using CGI or virtual reality techniques. Some argue that the interior shots of the capsule look too polished, comparing them to Hollywood productions. Others say that space tourism itself is nothing more than a billionaire’s fantasy and that no independent observers can confirm that Fram2 actually happened. But these claims fall apart under scrutiny. Fram2 was tracked in real time by independent astronomers, radio operators, and satellite tracking stations. Ham radio enthusiasts received signals directly from the spacecraft, and multiple telescopes captured images of the capsule in orbit. If the mission were faked, how did so many independent observers verify its presence in space? < Another common argument is that the curvature of Earth seen in the footage was artificially created using a fisheye lens. However, this ignores the fact that the crew themselves saw the curvature with their own eyes. Additionally, high-altitude balloon footage, which is completely independent of NASA or SpaceX, also shows the same curvature. The physics of the mission align perfectly with known orbital mechanics, and the way objects behave in microgravity matches what we’ve seen in past missions. The idea that Fram2 was CGI would require an impossible level of real-time synchronization across multiple independent sources. The belief that all space footage is fake is not new. Every major space mission, from the Apollo moon landings to the ISS, has faced similar accusations. But Flat Earthers and other skeptics have yet to provide a single piece of verifiable evidence proving that space travel is a hoax. If Fram2 were fake, where are the whistleblowers? Why has no engineer, scientist, or technician come forward with concrete proof? In contrast, the evidence supporting the mission’s authenticity is overwhelming. It was tracked, it followed known physics, and it provided real scientific data that researchers are still analyzing. The controversy surrounding Fram2 is not about evidence but about belief. Many who claim it was fake are not interested in facts but in pushing a predetermined narrative. The reality is that private spaceflight is advancing rapidly, and more people than ever are experiencing space firsthand. The Fram2 mission was not only real but a major step forward for commercial space travel. The question now is not whether spaceflight is real but how far humanity will go in the coming decades.